Optimalisasi Penentuan Kriteria Siswa Kelas Unggul dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting

  • Khairunnisa Khairunnisa Universitas Imelda Medan
  • Sisksa Dwi Anggraini Universitas Imelda Medan
Keywords: Decision Support System, Simple Additive Weighting, Superior Class

Abstract

Education has an important role that is very decisive, not only for the development and realization of individuals but also for the development of the nation and state. This relates to the same quality of education and must be provided to Indonesian citizens, both normally and differently. The process of class division every new academic year is usually still carried out conventionally, namely by means of the sorting method and does not involve intelligent system technology. Therefore, not all students who enter the superior class have the desired criteria. The use of a Decision Support System (DSS) is expected to help the decisions made in selecting and determining who is the best student, considering that so far no particular method has been used in selecting students so that sometimes decisions are considered less objective and not on target. This decision support system using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method is processed with data sourced from student data at SMP Negeri 25 Padang. This research was conducted by finding the weight value for each attribute, then a ranking process was carried out that would determine the optimal alternative, namely the best students. Based on the analysis of the decision support system with this method is done by taking 3 criteria, namely the criteria for attitudes, criteria for value and criteria for ranking. Where the results of the researcher are the rankings that can support the best decisions for the criteria of superior class students. From the researcher, it can be concluded that the best students have high attitude criteria, high scoring criteria, and high ranking criteria. Based on the data that has been researched, there are students who score Exelia Monica with code A5 having a value of 3.

References

[1] Sepriadi, S., Zalfendi, Z., & Mardayanti, M. (2018). Perbedaan Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa Kelas Unggul dan Kelas Reguler Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 4 Kota Pariaman. Sporta Saintika, 3(1), 400. https://doi.org/10.24036/sporta.v3i1.60.

[2] Warnars, H. L. H. S., & Fahrudin, A. (2020). Prediksi Performa Siswa Dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). KILAT, 9(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.33322/kilat.v9i1.872.

[3] Yulianti, E., & Wati, S. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan Menggunakan Metode Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW) Jurnal TeknoIf, 7(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.21063/jtif.2019.v7.1.40-47.

[4] Haswan, F. (2019). Application of Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determine Outstanding School Principals. SinkrOn, 3(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v3i2.10082.

[5] A. Wulan Arumita, Musilhudin, M. (2016). Pembuatan model penilaian proses belajar mengajar perguruan tinggi mengunakan Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (StudiKasus: STMIK Pringsewu). Yogyakarta STIMK AMIKOM.

[6] Tri Pamungkas L. Sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian reward gur u be rprestasi menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada SMP Al-Iryad Al-Islamiyyah Semarang.

[7] Isnaini N. (2013). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan guru berprestasi dengan Simple Additive Weighting.

[8] fendi, D. M., Novita, N. (2019). Weight Product Dalam Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Bantuan Bedah Rumah. Jurnal Informasi dan Komputer, 7(1), 35-42.

[9] R. P. Pratama, I. Werdiningsih, and I. Puspitasari,. (2017). “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi di Sekolah Menengah Pertama dengan Metode VIKOR dan TOPSIS,” J. Inf. syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 113–121.

[10] Andriana, A. D., & Pratama, J. (2018). The Determination of Market Area using Single Additive Weightening (SAW). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 407, 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/407/1/012098.

[11] pusparini, N. N., Budiyantara, A., & Lusa, S. (2020). Pengaruh Knowledge Management System Untuk Jenjang Jabatan. 4(1), 80–88.

[12] E. Turban dan AE Jay,. (2005). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas ( Yogyakarta: Andi, edisi ke-7. vol. 1.

[13] Pendiagnosa, A., Warna, K., Pemrograman, M., Delphi, B., & Eniyati, S. (2011). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, 16(2), 171–176.

[14] Kusrini, M.Kom. (2007). Konsep Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta.

[15] Pahlevy, R. T. (2010). Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan penerima Beasiswa dengan Menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weughting (SAW). Surabaya: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional.

[16] S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati,A. Harjoko, and Retanto Wardoyo. (2013). Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Published
2022-08-08
How to Cite
Khairunnisa, K., & Anggraini, S. D. (2022). Optimalisasi Penentuan Kriteria Siswa Kelas Unggul dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. JITA (Journal of Information Technology and Accounting), 5(2), 43-51. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uimedan.ac.id/index.php/JITA/article/view/1039