PROFIL EMOSI IBU POSTPARTUM BERDASARKAN SKOR EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK GLOBAL 2013–2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52943/jikebi.v12i1.2212Keywords:
Postpartum Blues, EPDS, Maternal Emotion, Bibliometric Analysis, Maternal Mental HealthAbstract
Postpartum emotional disturbances remain a significant global maternal health concern. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has been widely used as a screening instrument to assess maternal emotional status during the postpartum period. This study aimed to analyze global research trends related to maternal emotional profiles based on EPDS scores using a bibliometric approach. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using publications indexed in the Scopus database from 2013 to 2023. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer to identify publication trends, citation networks, author collaborations, and keyword co-occurrence patterns. A total of 1,248 articles were identified. The highest number of publications occurred in 2021. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia were the most productive countries contributing to EPDS-related research. Keyword analysis revealed several dominant clusters, including postpartum depression, anxiety, social support, screening, and maternal mental health. The findings indicated increasing global attention to early screening and emotional profiling using the EPDS. Bibliometric mapping also demonstrated that EPDS-based research has gradually shifted toward preventive interventions and the development of digital screening tools. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the development of EPDS-related research and highlights the need to strengthen midwifery-based early detection strategies for maternal mental health.
References
REFERENCES
M. W. O’Hara and J. E. McCabe, “Postpartum depression: Current status and future directions,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 379–407, 2019.
D. E. Stewart and S. N. Vigod, “Postpartum depression,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 381, no. 22, pp. 2127–2136, 2019.
A. Donthu et al., “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
C. S. Dweck, Mindset. Random House, 2016.
A. S. Masten, Ordinary Magic. Guilford Press, 2018.
S. Cohen and T. A. Wills, “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 98, pp. 310–357, 1985.
L. E. Sockol, “CBT for perinatal depression,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 232, pp. 1–15, 2018.
L. M. Howard and H. Khalifeh, “Perinatal mental health,” Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 7, pp. 123–135, 2020.
J. Kabat-Zinn, Mindfulness for Beginners. Sounds True, 2017.
S. M. Southwick et al., “Resilience definitions,” European Journal of Psychotraumatology, vol. 8, 2017.
P. Kim et al., “The plasticity of the maternal brain,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 20, pp. 287–296, 2017.
N. Racine et al., “Social support and postpartum depression,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 71, pp. 62–72, 2019.
J. S. Beck, Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Guilford Press, 2020.
D. A. Clark and A. T. Beck, Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders, Guilford Press, 2019.
S. Folkman and J. T. Moskowitz, “Coping: Pitfalls and promise,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 745–774, 2017.
R. S. Lazarus and S. Folkman, Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, Springer, 1984.
J. N. Felder et al., “Mindfulness-based interventions,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 74, pp. 1786–1798, 2018.
D. Fletcher and M. Sarkar, “Mental fortitude and resilience,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 79–100, 2016.
J. Gu et al., “Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 37, pp. 1–12, 2016.
C. E. Hostinar et al., “Psychobiological mechanisms of support,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 143, pp. 872–898, 2017.
American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5-TR, 2022.
